In psychology, many kinds of human consciousness are seen as unnatural and unintuitive. Because of this, intuitive sciences have already been recognised and understood by modern people. However, most people regard these intuitive thoughts as true feelings and accept them. In reality, everything that is intuitive and hard to comprehend is made up of tiny particles which then form fine perceptions in the brain. Through direct perception, a person's innate capabilities will be connected by the body's own physical and mental response. However, psychology holds the view that the intuitive impression of a normal mindset is not part of the relation between physical and cognitive response. Instead, it is an abstract sense created by the mind.
When a person analyses or tries to understandan object or event intuitively, the brain is managing a variety of information. If this information does not belong to your storehouse-consciousness, you will tend to not believe that your intuition is correct. You will only understand it from its meaning. When a perception exists in your consciousness and collides with the stored information, you will undoubtedly feel the energy of intuition that gives rise to a kind of cognition. You will then believe your intuition is correct. Hence, from a psychological point of view, there is nothing special about the human mind. It is simply a kind of intuition that makes you believe that what you see is a natural occurrence. However, these past and unnatural sub-consciousnesses have long been stored in your mind. So when, under specific conditions, you feel a psychological collision between the original perspectives and your stored perspectives, it leads you to develop an asserted impression in your mind. In other words, you believe and recognise that it exists.
As some “common knowledge” exists in your body and consciousness without our knowing it, just like electricity and germs exist in our lives, it is very hard for you to directly evaluate the veracity of asserted information. However, there are some flaws to the authenticity of an asserted event. Just as how different people view a specific event differently, some views are grounded in a fixed theoretical basis. Such views have their own specific practical meaning to them. However, to the people who have a closed mindset, such views are simply a kind of presumption that they believe to be correct. This will lead to a kind of evolution of assertiveness, meaning they use their suppressed memories to make inferences about the event.
Hence, we need to understand the importance of a person's source of information, their pre-existing asserted information, and how they truthfully comprehend this information. To recognise the unintuitive is to divide cognitive labour. One needs to have sufficient resources to re-evaluate the information they acquire, whether unnatural or unintuitive.
发表于 
